Casey v. Brockley et al, No. 9:2013cv01271 - Document 88 (N.D.N.Y 2018)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: The 85 Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED, that 1. Defendants' 71 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and plaintiff's complaint is DISM ISSED as against defendants Racette, Clapper, Boyce, and Hermance; 2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to defendants Brockley, Colvin, Mayo, Goodrich, and Wanniger and those claims remain; and 3. Trial on the remaining claims is scheduled for August 13, 2018, in Utica, New York. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/19/18. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Casey v. Brockley et al Doc. 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ERIC CASEY, Plaintiff, -v- 9:13-CV-1271 (DNH/TWD) M. BROCKLEY, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; H. COLVIN, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; A. MAYO, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; C. GOODRICH, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; WANNINGER, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; H. CLAPPER, Registered Nurse, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; T. HERMANCE, Registered Nurse, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; BOYCE, Registered Nurse, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; and S. RACETTE, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: ERIC CASEY Plaintiff pro se 25 West 132nd Street - Apt. 5J New York, NY 10037 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 BRIAN W. MATULA, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Eric Casey brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 16, 2018, the Honorable Therese Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. Magistrate Judge Dancks recommended that summary judgment be granted as to defendants Racette, Clapper, Boyce, and Hermance and those defendants dismissed and denied as to defendants Brockley, Colvin, Mayo, Goodrich, and Wanniger. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as against defendants Racette, Clapper, Boyce, and Hermance; 2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to defendants Brockley, Colvin, Mayo, Goodrich, and Wanniger and those claims remain; and 3. Trial on the remaining claims is scheduled for August 13, 2018, in Utica, New York. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: March 19, 2018 Utica, New York. 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
