Gibbons v. Prindle, No. 9:2012cv01605 - Document 30 (N.D.N.Y 2014)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: On May 23, 2014, the Court issued a Decision and Order ruling that, inter alia, I would conduct an in camera review of Defendant Prindle's personnel files and the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Direc tives ## 2111 and 2260. Dkt. No. 28 at p. 4. On June 19, 2014, the Court performed a thorough in camera review of the above- mentioned items. Based upon the review, the Court finds the following: 1) Directive #2260 pertains specifically to correctio nal officers' conduct outside of their employment, whether business or political, and the submission of financial disclosure statements of those deem to be policymakers. In light of the nature of this action, and in the broader context, Di rective #2260 is not relevant nor calculated to lead to admissible evidence, with one exception. Paragraph designated X deals with an employee's duty to report corruption, fraud, and other abuses. Not certain of this paragraph's total relevance to this litigation, it is conceivable that it could lead to admissible evidence. Therefore, Directive #2111 shall be disclosed in redacted form: Only the Caption and Paragraphs I and X shall be disclosed to Gibbons. 2) Directive # 2111 co ncerns the duty to report employee misconduct. Again, not completely certain of its relevance in this litigation, it still may lead to admissible evidence. This Directive shall be disclosed. 3) A review of Prindle's personnel file does not rev eal any relevant information nor impeachment material. Accordingly, Prindle's personnel file will not be disclosed. Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED, that Defendant's Counsel retrieve these records from Chambers forthwit h. A copy of the redacted Directive #2260 and a full version of Directive #2111 shall be served upon Gibbons promptly; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court mail a copy of this Decision and Order to Dylan Gibbons at this last known address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 6/19/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail to last known address)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DYLAN GIBBONS, Plaintiff, -v- Civ. No. 9:12-CV-1605 (FJS/RFT) S. PRINDLE Defendant. R RANDOLPH F. TREECE United States Magistrate Judge DECISION and ORDER On May 23, 2014, the Court issued a Decision and Order ruling that, inter alia, I would conduct an in camera review of Defendant Prindle s personnel files and the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Directives ## 2111 and 2260. Dkt. No. 28 at p. 4. F On June 19, 2014, the Court performed a thorough in camera review of the above-mentioned items. Based upon the review, the Court finds the following: Directive #2260 pertains specifically to correctional officers conduct outside of their employment, whether business or political, and the submission of financial disclosure statements of those deem to be policymakers. In light of the nature of this action, and in the broader context, Directive #2260 is not relevant nor calculated to lead to admissible evidence, with one exception. Paragraph designated X deals with an employee s duty to report corruption, fraud, and other abuses. Not certain of this paragraph s total relevance to this litigation, it is conceivable that it could lead to admissible evidence. Therefore, Directive #2111 shall be disclosed in redacted form: Only the Caption and Paragraphs I and X shall be disclosed to Gibbons. 2) Directive # 2111 concerns the duty to report employee misconduct. Again, not completely certain of its relevance in this litigation, it still may lead to admissible evidence. This Directive shall be disclosed. 3) A review of Prindle s personnel file does not reveal any relevant information nor impeachment material. Accordingly, Prindle s personnel file will not be disclosed. T 1) Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED, that Defendant s Counsel retrieve these records from Chambers forthwith. A copy of the redacted Directive #2260 and a full version of Directive #2111 shall be served upon Gibbons promptly; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court mail a copy of this Decision and Order to Dylan Gibbons at this last known address. IT IS SO ORDERED. R June 19, 2014 Albany, New York F T -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.