Self v. LaValley et al, No. 9:2010cv01463 - Document 84 (N.D.N.Y 2015)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 82 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 64 ) is DENIED as moot. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 44 ) is DISMISSED. ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment for Defendants and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/23/15. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
Self v. LaValley et al Doc. 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ DONALD R. SELF, Plaintiff, 9:10-CV-1463 (GTS/TWD) v. THOMAS LAVALLEY, Superintendent; KAREN LAPOLT, Deputy Superintendent of Programs; STEPHEN ROWE, Captain of Corrections; RON ATKINSON, Senior Spv. Counselor; and S. HAHN, Officer of Corrections, Defendants. _____________________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: DONALD R. SELF, 95-B-2539 Plaintiff, Pro Se Otisville Correctional Facility Box 8 Otisville, New York 10963 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Counsel for Defendants The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 TIFFINAY M. RUTNIK, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Currently before the Court, in this prisoner civil rights action filed pro se by Donald R. Self (“Plaintiff”) against the five above-captioned New York State correctional employees (“Defendants”), are Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks’ Report-Recommendation recommending that (1) Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order pursuant to Dockets.Justia.com Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and (2) that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied as moot. (Dkt. Nos. 64, 82.) Plaintiff has not filed an Objection to the Report-Recommendation and the deadline by which to do so has expired. (See generally Docket Sheet.) After carefully reviewing the relevant filings in this action, the Court can find no clear error in the ReportRecommendation: Magistrate Judge Dancks employed the proper legal standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Court accepts and adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. (Dkt. No. 82.) ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks’ Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 82) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 64) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 44) is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment for Defendants and CLOSE this case. The Court certifies, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal taken from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated: January 23 , 2015 Syracuse, New York 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.