-ATB Warren v. Corcoran et al, No. 9:2009cv01146 - Document 37 (N.D.N.Y 2011)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 33 is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/17/2011. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------EVAN WARREN, Plaintiff, -v- 9:09-CV-1146 MICHAEL CORCORAN; SUE LENNOX; J. BIGGAR; L. JOHNSON; D. CRULL; C. BURGIN; and J. KEISER, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: EVAN WARREN, 06-B-2142 Plaintiff, pro se Clinton Correctional Facility Box 2002 Dannemora, NY 12929 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendant The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 C. HARRIS DAGUE, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On October 20, 2011, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the complaint dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 17, 2011 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
