Gillard v. Rovelli et al, No. 9:2009cv00431 - Document 65 (N.D.N.Y 2012)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER granting Defts' 56 Motion for Summary Judgment and all claims in this action are dismissed; adopting 64 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/21/12. [Served by cert. mail.] (sfp, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ GARY GILLARD, Plaintiff, vs. 9:09-CV-0431 (TJM/DEP) SCOTT HAMEL and PETER McNALLY, Defendants. _________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the ReportRecommendation and Order dated February 24, 2012 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. It is therefore, ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 56 ) is GRANTED, and all claims in this action are DISMISSED. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: March 21, 2012 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
