COUSIN et al v. DODRILL et al, No. 9:2008cv00848 - Document 41 (N.D.N.Y 2010)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 40 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34 ) is GRANTED; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/17/10. (order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (mnc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MUADHDHIN COUSIN, Plaintiff, -against- 9:08-CV-0848 (LEK/DEP) SCOTT DODRILL, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 25, 2010, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. Dkt. No. 40. Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Peebles Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 40) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further 1 ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 17, 2010 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
