Benjamin v. Kooi et al, No. 9:2007cv00506 - Document 49 (N.D.N.Y 2010)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 48 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 42 ) is GRANTED; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 44 ) is DENIED; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/17/10. (order served on plaintiff by regular mail)(mnc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RABINDRANATH BENJAMIN, Plaintiff, -against- 9:07-CV-0506 (LEK/DRH) PANG LAY KOOI, Medical Doctor; CAROL WALLACE, Registered Nurse, Cayuga County Jail; and JACKIE CHADWICK, Registered Nurse, Cayuga County Jail, Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 25, 2010, by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. Dkt. No. 48. Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Homer s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby 1 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 48) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Cross-Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 44) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 17, 2010 Albany, New York 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.