Roat v. Barnhart, No. 8:2007cv00021 - Document 17 (N.D.N.Y 2010)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the adopted Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 07, 2010. (sas) (Main Document 17 replaced on 6/7/2010) (sas, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES ROAT, Plaintiff, -against- 8:07-CV-0021 (LEK/DRH) JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on May 17, 2010, by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 15). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1 of the Northern District of New York. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Homer s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the adopted Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15); and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 07, 2010 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
