Mead v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 6:2019cv01169 - Document 14 (N.D.N.Y 2020)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 13 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole; Therefore, it is ORDERED that, The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/14/2020. (mgh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mead v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 14 Case 6:19-cv-01169-DNH-ATB Document 14 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------KEITH M., Plaintiff, -v- 6:19-CV-1169 (DNH/ATB) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ Attorney for Plaintiff 148 West Dominick Street Rome, NY 13440 PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Attorneys for Defendant J.F.K. Federal Building, Room 625 15 New Sudbury Street Boston, MA 02203 LUIS PERE, ESQ. Special Ass't U.S. Attorney DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Keith M. filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Supplemental Security Income. By Report-Recommendation dated September 14, 2020, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed, and Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:19-cv-01169-DNH-ATB Document 14 Filed 10/14/20 Page 2 of 2 plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2020 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
