Young v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 6:2018cv00135 - Document 20 (N.D.N.Y 2019)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER re 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Kareem Rashawn Young, 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by Kareem Rashawn Young. Pro se plaintiff Kareem Rashawn Yo ung commenced this action pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422. On May 9, 2019, the Honorable Thrse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's motion to amend be denied for lack of subject matt er jurisdiction. Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the Report- Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U. S.C.§ 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED; and 2. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/3/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(khr, )

Download PDF
Young v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------KAREEM RASHAWN YOUNG, Plaintiff, -v- 6:18-CV-135 (DNH/TWD) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: KAREEM RASHAWN YOUNG Plaintiff, pro se 04-B-2504 Watertown Correctional Facility PO Box 168 Watertown, NY 13601 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Kareem Rashawn Young commenced this action pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422. On May 9, 2019, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's motion to amend be denied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dockets.Justia.com Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED; and 2. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 3, 2019 Utica, New York. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.