Ramic v. AFSA Data, No. 6:2015cv01243 - Document 10 (N.D.N.Y 2015)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER accepting Report and Recommendations. Pltf's complaint is dismissed in its entirety as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/23/15. [Served Pltf by cert. mail.](sfp, )

Download PDF
Ramic v. AFSA Data Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ELDIN RAMIC, Plaintiff, -v- 6:15-CV-1243 (DNH/ATB) AFSA DATA, Defendant. -------------------------------ELDIN RAMIC, Plaintiff, -v- 6:15-CV-1244 (DNH/ATB) LB SECURITY, Defendant. ------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: ELDIN RAMIC Plaintiff, Pro se 727 Mary Street Utica, NY 13501 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Eldin Ramic brought separate actions against defendants AFSA Data and LB Security alleging civil rights violations. On October 26, 2015, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that both Dockets.Justia.com complaints be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). Plaintiff has submitted timely objections. See ECF No. 9 in Case No. 6:15-CV-1243 and ECF No. 8 in Case No. 6:15-CV-1244. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint in Case No. 6:15-CV-1243 is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; 2. Plaintiff’s complaint in Case No. 6:15-CV-1244 is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; and 3. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 23, 2015 Utica, New York -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.