Hull v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 6:2008cv00050 - Document 17 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER finding as moot 16 Report and Recommendations. This action is dimissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 41.2 for failure to prosecute. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/12/09. (sfp, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ EUGENE C. HULL, Plaintiff, -v.- No. 6:08-CV-050 (TJM/DRH) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER On January 14, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pro se appealing from a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Compl. [dkt. # 1]. The matter was referred to the Hon. David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. As stated in Magistrate Judge Homer s December 24, 2008 ReportRecommendation and Order [dkt. # 16], Plaintiff failed to comply with Magistrate Judge Homer s September 2, 2008 Order that directed him to file his brief in this matter by October 6, 2008. Further, Plaintiff failed to comply with Magistrate Judge Homer s December 24, 2008 Order that required Plaintiff to file with the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of the service of this Order an affidavit that details the reasons why this 1 action should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Rep-Rec. 2. Finally, Plaintiff has not filed any objection to Magistrate Judge Homer s recommendation that if no such affidavit is received by the Court [within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the December 24, 2008 Report-Recommendation and Order], or if plaintiff otherwise fails to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed, that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has clearly abandoned the prosecution of this matter. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 41.2 for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED DATED:March 12, 2009 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
