Partee v. The City of Syracuse et al, No. 5:2019cv00417 - Document 7 (N.D.N.Y 2019)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendation. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Order, Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's 1 complaint is accepted for filing only with respect to plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim against defendant Cowan. Plaintiff's remaining claims, asserted against all other defendants named in this action, are DISMISSED with leave to replead by filing an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes in all respects the prior pleading. Therefore, if plaintiff files an amended complaint, he must properly allege in the amended complaint all fac tual bases for all claims asserted therein, and the amended complaint must be in compliance with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/26/2019. (Copy served via regular and certified mail) (dpk)

Download PDF
Partee v. The City of Syracuse et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ CEDRIC PARTEE a/k/a WEBB, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 5:19-CV-0417 (TJM/DEP) v. THE CITY OF SYRACUSE, et al., Defendants _________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. In his May 23, 2019 Order, Report, and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 6], Magistrate Judge Peebles recommends that plaintiff's complaint [Dkt. No. 1] be accepted for filing only with respect to plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim against defendant Cowan, but that plaintiff's remaining claims, asserted against all other defendants named in this action, be dismissed with leave to replead within thirty days of any decision adopting the report. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Order, Report, and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Order, Report, and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Order, Report, and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 6] for the reasons stated therein. Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint [Dkt. No. 1] is accepted for filing only with respect to plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim against defendant Cowan. Plaintiff's remaining claims, asserted against all other defendants named in this action, are DISMISSED with leave to replead by filing an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes in all respects the prior pleading. Therefore, if plaintiff files an amended complaint, he must properly allege in the amended complaint all factual bases for all claims asserted therein, and the amended complaint must be in compliance with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:June 26, 2019 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.