Edwards v. Bogan, No. 5:2018cv01153 - Document 6 (N.D.N.Y 2019)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations. Pltf's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/21/19. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(sfp, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Edwards v. Bogan Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JASMINE GRACE-LOUISE EDWARDS, Plaintiff, -v- 5:18-CV-1153 (DNH/ATB) VANESSA E. BOGAN, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: JASMINE GRACE-LOUISE EDWARDS Plaintiff pro se 335 Valley Drive Syracuse, NY 13207 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Jasmine Grace-Louise Edwards brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On Septem ber 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on judicial immunity and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii); and 2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2019 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
