Klenchik v. Stanley-Ratchford et al, No. 5:2018cv00609 - Document 10 (N.D.N.Y 2018)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that, this action is DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order; If plaintiff files a timely amended complaint, it be forwarded to the MagistrateJudge for review; If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk dismiss the action without further order. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/29/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Klenchik v. Stanley-Ratchford et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JUDITH ANN KLENCHIK, Plaintiff, -v- 5:18-CV-609 (DNH/DEP) LATISHA STANLEY-RATCHFORD, Supervisor; CINDY SOMMERS, Human Resources; and DAN KELLY, Executive Director, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: JUDITH ANN KLENCHIK Plaintiff pro se 101 East Skyland Circle Asheville, NC 28806 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Judith Ann Klenchik brought this civil action alleging that defendants discriminated against her on the basis of disability in violation of federal law. On July 31, 2018, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by ReportRecommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Dockets.Justia.com Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. This action is DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order; 2. If plaintiff files a timely amended complaint, it be forwarded to the Magistrate Judge for review; and 3. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk dismiss the action without further order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2018 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
