Godley v. Onondaga County et al, No. 5:2016cv01419 - Document 17 (N.D.N.Y 2017)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that the 13 Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, is accepted and adopted in all respects. ORDERED that, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and Supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims is DECLINED and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 6/28/2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)

Download PDF
Godley v. Onondaga County et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ERICK GODLEY, Plaintiff, -v- 5:16-cv-1419 (DNH/TWD) ONONDAGA COUNTY, a municipality; ANN RETHER, Detective; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, District Attorney; MICHAEL MANFREDI, Assistant District Attorney; CHARLES KELLER, Attorney; and KEY BANK, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: ERICK GODLEY 14-B-1321 Plaintiff pro se Collins Correctional Facility P.O. Box 340 Collins, New York 14034 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Erick Godley brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2017, the Honorable Therese Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction be declined as to Dockets.Justia.com plaintiff's state law claims. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 2. Supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims is DECLINED and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2017 Utica, New York. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.