Davies v. Christopher Community et al, No. 5:2016cv00852 - Document 10 (N.D.N.Y 2016)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: that the Court Adopts the Report, Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 8 ] for the reasons stated therein. It is hereby Ordered that plaintiff's complaint [dkt. # 1 ] is Dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff is granted leave to replead. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/13/2016. (hmr)

Download PDF
Davies v. Christopher Community et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ROBERT M. DAVIES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 5:16-CV-0852 (TJM/DEP) CHRISTOPHER COMMUNITY, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This pro se employment action was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for initial review. In his September 9, 2016 Report, Recommendation and Order, Magistrate Judge Peebles: (1) granted plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis application; (2) denied with leave to renew plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel; and (3) recommended that all claims be dismissed, with leave to replead, because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted [dkt. # 8]. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report, Recommendation and Order, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report, Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 8] for 1 Dockets.Justia.com the reasons stated therein. Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint [dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff is granted leave to replead.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:October 13, 2016 1 The Court notes that on September 21, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Dkt. # 9. The Court offers no opinion as to the sufficiency of the allegations made therein. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.