Allen v. Colvin, No. 5:2014cv01576 - Document 18 (N.D.N.Y 2016)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting re 17 Report and Recommendations. Based upon careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/14/2016. (khr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allen v. Colvin Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------TAMARA L. ALLEN, Plaintiff, -v- 5:14-CV-1576 (DNH/ATB) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: Olinsky Law Group Attorneys for Plaintiff 300 S. State Street Suite 420 Syracuse, NY 13202 HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ. NATHANIEL V. RILEY, ESQ. Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 SERGEI ADEN , ESQ. Special Asst. U.S. Attorney DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Tamara L. Allen filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security income benefits and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. By ReportRecommendation dated February 22, 2016, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Dockets.Justia.com Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2016 Utica, New York -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
