Fisch v. Consulate General of the Republic of Poland of New York et al, No. 5:2011cv01297 - Document 16 (N.D.N.Y 2012)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Baxter's 4 Report and Recommendations; denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for a three judge court and dismissing the Plaintiff's 1 Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/26/2012. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. and cert. mail]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EUGENE J. FISCH, Plaintiff, -vs- 11-CV-1297 CONSULATE GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, et al., Defendants. Thomas J. McAvoy, United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER This matter was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation ( Report-Recommendation ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. Plaintiff has raised objections to the November 9, 2011 Report-Recommendation. When objections to a magistrate judge s Report-Recommendation are lodged, the Court reviews the record de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After such a review, the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The Court may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Id. Thus, the Court reviews the instant matter de novo. After reviewing the matter de novo, the Court agrees with the Report-Recommendation in its entirety. The Complaint should be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii), because it is frivolous and malicious; it fails to state a plausible claim on which relief can be granted; and it seeks relief against Defendants who are immune from such relief. Consequently, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety. The motion for a three judge court (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED as moot. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:January 26, 2012 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.