Wilder v. Brown et al, No. 3:2018cv00439 - Document 7 (N.D.N.Y 2018)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: The Report-Recommendation, is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED that, Plaintiff's complaint is accepted for filing; and The City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police Department. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/30/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)

Download PDF

Wilder v. Brown et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------TITUS WILDER, Plaintiff, -v- 3:18-CV-439 (DNH/DEP) PTL. KEVIN BROWN, Binghamton Police Department; PTL. DANIEL OSTANEK, Binghamton Police Department; BINGHAMTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; and BROOME COUNTY, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: TITUS WILDER Plaintiff, pro se 17-A-4315 Attica Correctional Facility Box 149 Attica, NY 14011 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Titus Wilder brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2018, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be accepted for filing but that the City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police Department. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Dockets.Justia.com Based upon a careful review of the Report-Recommendation, the ReportRecommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's complaint is accepted for filing; and 2. The City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police Department. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 30, 2018 Utica, New York. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.