Peeples v. United States of America, No. 3:2017mc00026 - Document 11 (N.D.N.Y 2017)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 Report and Recommendations.; denying 1 Motion for Return of Property. The Petitioners objections to the Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 9, are hereby OVERRULED. The Report-Recommenda tion, dkt. # 4, is hereby ACCEPTED. The motion for return of property seized pursuant to a search warrant, dkt. # 1, is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 11/28/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Peeples v. United States of America Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH W. PEEPLES, Petitioner, v. 3:17-MC-26 (TJM/ATB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Thomas J. McAvoy, SR. U.S.D.J. DECISION and ORDER The Court referred this action, which seeks return of property seized pursuant to a search warrant issued in this District, to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. The ReportRecommendation, dated November 3, 2017, recommends that Petitioner’s motion, which was brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), be denied. Petitioner filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. When objections to a magistrate judge’s Report-Recommendation are lodged, the Court makes a “de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After such a review, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also receive further 1 Dockets.Justia.com evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. Having reviewed the record de novo and having considered the issues raised in the Petitioner’s objections, this Court has determined to accept and adopt the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Baxter for the reasons stated in the ReportRecommendation. Accordingly: The Petitioner’s objections to the Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 9, are hereby OVERRULED. The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 4, is hereby ACCEPTED. The motion for return of property seized pursuant to a search warrant, dkt. # 1, is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated:November 28, 2017 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
