Walker v. Village Court et al, No. 3:2017cv00390 - Document 9 (N.D.N.Y 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: The # 8 Report-Recommendations of Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles is accepted in whole. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/20/2017. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.](mc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walker v. Village Court et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ALFRED MARION WALKER, Plaintiff, -v- 3:17-CV-390 (DNH/DEP) VILLAGE COURT; THE STATE OF NEW YORK; VILLAGE OF ENDICOTT; ENDICOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DUNHAM, Badge # 470; OFFICER J WANKA, Badge # 478; CAPTAIN COLLINS; JUDGE ALFONSO ORTEGA; DAVID STOKES; KAREN MICALIZZI TAUTERO; C.O. ZACHARY MOOR; SGT BIXBY, C.O.; C.O. RICK BORCHARDT; C.O. DENNIS ROWD; C.O. SEAN BELL; BROOME COUNTY JAIL; and BROOME COUNTY, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: ALFRED MARION WALKER Plaintiff pro se c/o 60 Saratoga Avenue Apartment 114 Binghamton, NY 13901 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Alfred Marion Walker brought this action against various state and local agencies and employees. On August 4, 2017, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failing to pay either a statutory filing fee or submit a properly supported Dockets.Justia.com application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, despite multiple opportunities to do so and advisement of same. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 20, 2017 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
