Sero v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2014cv00025 - Document 21 (N.D.N.Y 2014)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER. The Report-Recommendation, Dkt. # 20 , is accepted in whole. ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and the complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/19/2014. (lah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sero v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------SELIM SERO, Plaintiff, -v- 3:14-CV-25 (DNH/CFH) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: SELIM SERO Plaintiff Pro Se 146 Moeller Street Binghamton, NY 13904 OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Attorneys for Defendant Social Security Administration Region II 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 SIXTINA FERNANDEZ, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Selim Sero filed this action seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security that Sero was not without fault accepting an alleged overpayment of Supplemental Security Income benefits, and that Sero was therefore not entitled to a waiver. The Commissioner cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. By Report-Recommendation dated October 28, 2014, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, Dockets.Justia.com United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed and the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and 2. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2014 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
