Miller v. Barnhart, No. 3:2007cv01093 - Document 21 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED and Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 19, 2009. (sas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DUANE MILLER, Plaintiff, -v- 3:07-CV-1093 (LEK/VEB) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on July 29, 2009, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(d) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 20). Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to the ReportRecommendation filed by Judge Bianchini. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby 1 Michael J. Astrue became Commissioner of Social Security on February 12, 2007. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Michael J. Astrue is substituted as the Defendant in this action for Jo Anne B. Barnhart. 1 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED and Defendant s Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 19, 2009 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
