Vazquez v. Standford et al, No. 1:2018cv01071 - Document 26 (N.D.N.Y 2019)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects: that Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice; that Plaintiff's pending letter motions, ECF Nos. 4 , 21 , 24 , and 25 , are Denied as moot a nd that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 07/31/2019. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff at Collins Correctional Facility at P.O. Box 340, Collins, NY 14034 via regular and certified mail on 7/31/2019.)(hmr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vazquez v. Standford et al Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JOSE VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, -v- 1:18-CV-1071 (DNH/DJS) TINA STANDFORD MICHAEL ASTRUE; DAVID STUKOWY; and SAMUEL D. ROBERTS, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: JOSE VAZQUEZ Plaintiff pro se 74-A-0117 Collins Correctional Facility P.O. Box 340 Collins, NY 14034 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Jose Vazquez brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Stewart advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) & 1915A for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. He has since filed various other letter motions. ECF Nos. 24, 25. Also pending are previous letter motions filed by plaintiff. ECF Nos. 4, 21. Dockets.Justia.com Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff's pending letter motions, ECF Nos. 4, 21, 24, and 25, are DENIED as moot; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2019 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
