Kravitz v. City of Hudson et al, No. 1:2017cv01175 - Document 5 (N.D.N.Y 2017)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 Report and Recommendations. The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 4, is hereby ADOPTED. All claims in theComplaint, dkt. # 1, brought against Defendants Craig Haigh and Sergeant Miller in t hei official capacities, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remainder of the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with an opportunity to amend so that Plaintiff may provide the Court with additional information to permit the Court to assess whether Plaintiffs claims are barred by Heck v Humphrey.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/12/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)

Download PDF
Kravitz v. City of Hudson et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAY S. KRAVITZ, Plaintiff, v. 1:17-cv-1175 (TJM/CFH) CITY OF HUDSON, et al., Defendants. Thomas J. McAvoy, SR. U.S.D.J. DECISION and ORDER The Court referred this action, which is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and alleges Defendants violated Plaintiff’s civil rights in the way they searched his property, to the Hon. Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. The Report-Recommendation, dated November 16, 2017, recommended that the Court dismiss some claims against some Defendants with prejudice and dismiss the rest of the Complaint without prejudice to filing an amended complaint that demonstrated that Plaintiff’s claims were not barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report-Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has passed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice 1 Dockets.Justia.com and the Court will adopt the Report-Recommendation. Accordingly: The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 4, is hereby ADOPTED. All claims in the Complaint, dkt. # 1, brought against Defendants Craig Haigh and Sergeant Miller in their official capacities, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remainder of the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with an opportunity to amend so that Plaintiff may provide the Court with additional information to permit the Court to assess whether Plaintiff’s claims are barred by Heck v Humphrey. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:December 12, 2017 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.