Moss v. Zara USA Inc., No. 1:2017cv00875 - Document 6 (N.D.N.Y 2018)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that This action is DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order; If plaintiff files a timely amended comp laint, it be forwarded to the Magistrate Judge for review; and If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk dismiss the action without further order.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/15/2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Moss v. Zara USA Inc. Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------KYRA MOSS, Plaintiff, -v- 1:17-CV-875 (DNH/DEP) ZARA USA INC., Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: KYRA MOSS Plaintiff pro se 18 Providence Place #7 Albany, NY 12202 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Kyra Moss brought this action against Zara USA Inc. On October 18, 2017, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed, with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order. Mail sent to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that 1. This action is DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order; 2. If plaintiff files a timely amended complaint, it be forwarded to the Magistrate Judge for review; and 3. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk dismiss the action without further order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 15, 2018 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
