A.W. et al v. Board of Education Wallkill Central School District, No. 1:2014cv01583 - Document 18 (N.D.N.Y 2015)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltfs' 11 Stay Put Motion ; accepting in whole the 17 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/26/15. (sfp, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
A.W. et al v. Board of Education Wallkill Central School District Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------A.W. and N.W., individually and on behalf of B.W., a student with a disability, Plaintiffs, 1:14-CV-1583 (DNH/RFT) -v- BOARD OF EDUCATION WALLKILL CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: OFFICE OF BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD Attorney for Plaintiffs 2 Penn Center, Suite 1020 1500 JFK Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19102 BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD, ESQ GINA DECRESCENZO P.C. Attorney for Plaintiffs 180 South Broadway, Suite 302 White Plains, NY 10605 GINA M. DECRESCENZO, ESQ. THOMAS, DROHAN, WAXMAN, PETIGROW & MAYLE, LLP Attorneys for Defendant 2517 Route 52 Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 NEELANJAN CHOUDHURY, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiffs bring this action, pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Dockets.Justia.com Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A), as well as other federal and statutory provisions, seeking a review of the final administrative decision rendered by the New York State Review Officer on September 19, 2014. On April 21, 2015, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiffs' stay put motion be denied. No objections to the Report-Recom mendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' stay put motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
