Younes v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2014cv00170 - Document 22 (N.D.N.Y 2015)
Court Description: DECISION & ORDER: It is Ordered that the # 19 Report and Recommendations are ADOPTED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's # 1 Complaint is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/2/2015. (jmb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Younes v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------SAMANTHA ISOLINA YOUNES, Plaintiff, -v- 1:14-CV-170 (DNH/ESH) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN R. DOLSON Attorneys for Plaintiff 126 North Salina Street, Suite 3B Syracuse, NY13202 MAGGIE W. MCOMBER, ESQ. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Social Security Administration Region II Attorneys for Defendant 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 SIXTINA FERNANDEZ, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Samantha Isolina Younes filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for child's and disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income available under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated March 13, 2015, the Honorable Earl S. Dockets.Justia.com Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and plaintiff's complaint be dismissed. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo determination of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to file a judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 2, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
