Riviere v. Steiner et al, No. 1:2010cv00605 - Document 5 (N.D.N.Y 2010)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 09, 2010. (sas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Riviere v. Steiner et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ESSENCE JORDAN RIVIERE, Plaintiff, -against- 1:10-CV-605 (LEK/RFT) DAVID M. STEINER, Education Comm r; BETHLEHEM CITY TOWN CLERK; DAVID J. SWARTS, Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on June 24, 2010, by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 4). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Treece s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is 1 Dockets.Justia.com GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiff s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 13, 2010 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
