Allen v. Geico Indemnity Company, No. 1:2009cv00711 - Document 8 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that in light of Plaintiffs pro se status, prior to any dismissal, Plaintiff be afforded thirty days to amend his Comp laint consistent with the instructions in the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7); and it is further ORDERED, that should the Plaintiff fail to file an amended Complaint within thirty days of this Order, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED in its entirety without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 31, 2009. (sas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VICTOR JEROME ALLEN, Plaintiff, -against- 1:09-CV-0711 (LEK/RFT) GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 14, 2009, by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 7). Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Treece s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that in light of Plaintiff s pro se status, prior to any dismissal, Plaintiff be afforded thirty days to amend his Complaint consistent with the instructions in the Report1 Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7); and it is further ORDERED, that should the Plaintiff fail to file an amended Complaint within thirty days of this Order, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED in its entirety without further order of the Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 31, 2009 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
