Ebert v. Astrue, No. 1:2007cv01166 - Document 14 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for judgment on the pleading is GRANTED, the Commissioners determination of no disability is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the agency for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on November 10, 2009. (sas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRENDA EBERT, Plaintiff, -against- 1:07-CV-1166 (LEK/DEP) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on October 22, 2009, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13). Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Peeble s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Motion for judgment on the pleading is GRANTED, the 1 Commissioner s determination of no disability is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the agency for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendation; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 10, 2009 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
