Szafran v. Sandata Technologies, Inc., No. 2:2003cv02606 - Document 223 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - In response to the Second Circuit's summary order, dated December 2, 2011 and pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby directs the Clerk of the Court to amend the Final Judgment (Do cket Entry 219) to include the following language after the words "disbursements to date"; "and in favor of the defendant on the quantum meruit claim and the New York labor law claim." So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/6/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Szafran v. Sandata Technologies, Inc. Doc. 223 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------X EMIL SZAFRAN, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 03-CV-2606(JS) -againstSANDATA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. ---------------------------------------X APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: Sanford F. Young, Esq. Sanford F. Young, P.C. 225 Broadway, Suite 2008 New York, NY 10007 Defendant: Martin D. Edel, Esq. Miller & Wrubel, P.C. 250 Park Avenue New York, NY 10177 SEYBERT, District Judge: In response to the Second Circuit’s summary order, dated December 2, 2011 and pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby directs the Clerk of the Court to amend the Final Judgment (Docket Entry 219) to include the following language after the words “disbursements to date”: “and in favor of the defendant on the quantum meruit claim and the New York labor law claim.” SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______ Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J. Dated: December 6 , 2011 Central Islip, NY Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
