Lukic v. Elezovic, No. 1:2020cv03110 - Document 22 (E.D.N.Y. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached opinion and order, I grant in part the parties' motion to seal various exhibits to their cross motions for summary judgment 21 and deny it in part. I grant the parties' motion as to docume nts docketed as ECF Nos. 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 21-4, 21-6 and 21-10. I grant the parties' motion in part as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-11, 21-12 and 21-13 and direct them to file redacted versions of these documents. I deny the parties 9; motion as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-5 and 21-9. I reserve judgment on the parties' motion as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-7 and 21-8 and direct the parties to submit translated versions of these documents under seal no later than January 25, 2021. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 1/20/2021. (Roeck, Victoria)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lukic v. Elezovic Doc. 22 Case 1:20-cv-03110-ARR-LB Document 22 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------TOMISLAV LUKIC, Petitioner, -againstBAHRIJA ELEZOVIC, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------- X : : : : : : : : : : : : X 20-CV-3110 (ARR) (LB) NOT FOR ELECTRONIC OR PRINT PUBLICATION OPINION & ORDER ROSS, United States District Judge: In this Hague Convention action, the parties jointly have moved to seal various exhibits to their cross motions for summary judgment because they “may contain confidential, personally identifiable, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than litigating this action would be warranted.” Mot. Seal 1, ECF No. 21. I grant the parties’ motion in part and deny it in part. The Second Circuit has held that “documents submitted to a court for its consideration in a summary judgment motion are—as a matter of law—judicial documents to which a strong presumption of access attaches, under both the common law and the First Amendment.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006). I may seal such judicial documents only if I determine, based on “specific, on the record findings,” that sealing is “essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” Id. at 120. Protecting personally identifiable information about a minor child is a higher value that overcomes the First Amendment presumption of access. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). The parties seek to seal thirteen documents supporting their cross motions for summary 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-03110-ARR-LB Document 22 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 627 judgment. Mot. Seal 1. I grant their motion as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 21-4, 21-6 and 21-10. ECF Nos. 21-1 and 21-2 are depositions of petitioner and respondent which contain significant personally identifiable information about the couple’s minor children. Without reviewing the parties’ summary judgment briefing, I cannot determine whether sealing the documents in their entirety is narrowly tailored to protect that information, so I reserve judgment on whether to unseal portions of these documents in the future. ECF Nos. 21-3, 21-4, 21-6 and 21-10 contain sensitive identification documents about a minor child and must be sealed in their entirety. I grant the parties’ motion to seal in part as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-11, 21-12 and 21-13. These documents contain some personally identifiable information about a minor child and the parties’ financial accounts. I direct the parties to publicly file redacted versions of these documents. I deny the parties’ motion to seal as to documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-5 and 21-9. These documents already are in the public record (redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)), docketed as ECF Nos. 10-3 and 10-6 respectively. I reserve judgment on the parties’ motion to seal documents docketed as ECF Nos. 21-7 and 21-8. These documents are written in Montenegrin and the parties have not submitted English translations. I direct the parties to submit translated versions of these documents under seal no later than January 25, 2021. SO ORDERED. ________/s/___________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: January 20, 2021 Brooklyn, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
