Bey v. Ponte et al, No. 1:2017cv03476 - Document 48 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/24/17 that On September 20, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference, to compel discovery, and for summary judgement. Plaintiffs motion is denied as moot as the case has already been c losed and judgment entered. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/24/2017 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)

Download PDF
Bey v. Ponte et al Doc. 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------VICKY WARE BEY, Plaintiff, - against JOSEPH PONTE; AARON SCARLETT; NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CITY OF NEW YORK; CYNTHIA BRANN; JOHN DOE 1-1000; and JANE DOE 1-1000, Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------- C/M X : : : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER 17-cv-3476 (BMC)(JO) X By Memorandum Decision and Order dated September 13, 2017, I granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, denied the remaining open motions as moot, and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the unserved defendants and enter judgment in favor of those who had been served. Judgment was entered and the unserved defendants were dismissed on September 15, 2017. On September 20, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference, to compel discovery, and for summary judgement. Plaintiff’s motion is denied as moot as the case has already been closed and judgment entered. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). SO ORDERED. Digitally signed by Brian M. Cogan ______________________________________ U.S.D.J. Dated: Brooklyn, New York September 24, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.