Radin v. Doctor Tun et al, No. 1:2012cv01393 - Document 106 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order dated 6/30/2014, which dismissed her complaint against Judge Pamela Chen and Magistrate Judge Vera Scanlon, is denied. The Court will not consider plai ntiff's "corrections" to her motion filed on 7/21 and 7/22/2014. Plaintiff had until 7/17/2014, to make her submissions to the Court, and these two filings were made out of time. Nonetheless, the Court notes that, even were it to consider these filings, they would not alter the Court's denial of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. The Court once again reminds plaintiff that, when she makes a submission to the Court, she must serve copies of her submission on all defendants and file with the court a sworn statement that she has done so. Finally, with respect to plaintiff's concern in her 7/22/2014, letter that Ani Couldjian-Baghdassaria, Dr. Carreri, Dr. Margaret Goni, and Dr., Janet Carr shou ld not have been terminated from the case because they are still defendants, those individuals were terminated from the case because they were not named as defendants in plaintiff's 91 Corrected Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, their termination was proper. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/22/2014. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)