Audrey v. Career Institute of Health and Technology et al, No. 1:2006cv05612 - Document 47 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/28/2016. (Greene, Donna)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Audrey v. Career Institute of Health and Technology et al Doc. 47 FILfcD IN CLERK'S OFFICE "LERK'S OFFK US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y. RICT COURT i DEC 2 8 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X BROOKLYN OFFICE KRISTIN AUDREY, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - against 06-CV-05612(AMD)(SMG) CAREER INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY and DR.KLEBER MOLINA, Defendants. X ANN DONNELLY,District Judge. The plaintiff brought this action against defendants Career Institute of Health and Technology and Dr. Kleber Molina on October 17, 2006, alleging gender discrimination, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under federal and New York state and city laws. In a Report and Recommendation issued on December 6,2016, Magistrate Judge Steven M.Gold recommended that the plaintiffs complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No party has objected to Judge Gold's Report and Recommendation within the time prescribed by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(l). In reviewing an R&R,a district court"may accept, reject, or modify,in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Where,as here, no party has objected to the magistrate judge's recommendation,"a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face ofthe record." Urena v. New York, Dockets.Justia.com s/Ann M. Donnelly
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
