Bishop v. Federal Government, No. 2:2022cv00571 - Document 6 (D.N.M. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ve)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bishop v. Federal Government Doc. 6 Case 2:22-cv-00571-KWR-GBW Document 6 Filed 08/23/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LEMYRON BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:22-cv-00571-KWR-GBW FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL On November 10, 2021, Senior United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera imposed filing restrictions on pro se Plaintiff. See Order Imposing Filing Restrictions, Doc. 10, filed in Bishop v. DHS, No. 2:21-cv-00887-JCH-KRS. Judge Herrera enjoined Plaintiff "from initiating further litigation in this Court unless either a licensed attorney who is admitted to practice before this Court signs the pleading or Plaintiff first obtains permission to proceed pro se." Order Imposing Filing Restrictions at 2 (describing the steps Plaintiff must take to obtain permission to proceed pro se in this Court). On July 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed two documents initiating a new case. See Doc. 1; Doc. 2. Neither document is signed by a licensed attorney who is admitted to practice in this Court. Plaintiff has not taken the required steps to obtain permission to proceed pro se in this Court. United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirements in the Order Imposing Filing Restrictions. See Doc. 4, filed August 4, 2022. Plaintiff's Response is largely incoherent, does not address his noncompliance with the requirements in Order Imposing Filing Restrictions, and does not otherwise show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-00571-KWR-GBW Document 6 Filed 08/23/22 Page 2 of 2 for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirements in the Order Imposing Filing Restrictions. See Doc. 5, filed August 19, 2022. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. _________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
