Unitednet, Ltd. et al v. Tata Communications America, Inc. et al, No. 1:2021cv01081 - Document 59 (D.N.M. 2023)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Consistent with the 58 Memorandum Opinion and Order filed March 28, 2023, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for forum non conveniens. (ve)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Unitednet, Ltd. et al v. Tata Communications America, Inc. et al Doc. 59 Case 1:21-cv-01081-KWR-JFR Document 59 Filed 03/28/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ___________________________ UNITEDNET, LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL, Plaintiffs, vs. No. 1:21-cv-01081-KWR-JFR TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, LTD., TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD., STEVEN LUCERO, and LATINGROUP, LLC, Defendants. JUDGMENT Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 58) filed March 28, 2023, herewith and with orders previously entered in this case, the Court issues its separate judgment dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims without prejudice for forum non conveniens, subject to the conditions identified in the Court’s orders. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for forum non conveniens. IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
