King v. United States of America, No. 1:2021cv00993 - Document 4 (D.N.M. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (gr)

Download PDF
King v. United States of America Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CYNTHIA KING, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:21-cv-00993-MV-KK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff’s Petition to the United States Grand Jury for Criminal Violations of Civil Rights, Doc. 1, filed October 12, 2021. Plaintiff, who does not reside in the District of New Mexico, seeks to have her Petition presented to the Grand Jury, makes vague allegations of civil rights violations regarding the presidential election, does not allege that any criminal violations occurred in the District of New Mexico, and seeks a declaration, subject to sufficient findings by the Grand Jury, that the presidential election is void. See Petition to the United States Grand Jury for Criminal Violations of Civil Rights, Doc. 1, filed October 12, 2021. Plaintiff did not pay the $402.00 fee for instituting a civil action or file an “Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form).” United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa ordered Plaintiff to either pay the fee or file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and notified Plaintiff that failure to timely comply may result in dismissal of this case. See Cure Order at 1, Doc. 3, filed October 13, 2021. Plaintiff did not pay the fee or file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by the November 3, 2021, deadline. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. _________________________________ MARTHA VÁZQUEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.