Strojnik v. Mehta et al, No. 1:2020cv01325 - Document 3 (D.N.M. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, All documents for the consolidated cases shall be filed only in case: Strojnik v. Albuquerque Boca Hotel, LP, No. 1:20-cv-00843-WJ-GBW (meq)

Download PDF
Strojnik v. Mehta et al Doc. 3 Case 1:20-cv-01325-WJ-GBW Document 3 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PETER STROJNIK, Plaintiff, v. ALBUQUERQUE BOCA HOTEL, LP D/B/A CROWNE PLAZA ALBUQUERQUE, No. 1:20-cv-00843-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00875-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00938-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00940-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00998-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-01034-WJ-GBW Consolidated Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed an action in state court which was removed to this Court. See Strojnik v. Mehta, No. 1:20-cv-01325-SCY-LF. Strojnik v. Mehta is very similar to several other cases previously filed by Plaintiff in state court which have been removed to this Court and consolidated in this action. Rule 42 allows the Court to consolidate actions if those actions “involve a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). Consolidation of Strojnik v. Mehta, No. 1:20cv-01325-SCY-LF, with this action will efficiently utilize Court resources by having the same presiding Judge and same referral Judge handling the seven cases. IT IS ORDERED that: (i) Strojnik v. Mehta, No. 1:20-cv-01325-SCY-LF, is consolidated with this case. (ii) The Clerk shall file this Order in Strojnik v. Mehta, No. 1:20-cv-01325-SCY-LF. (iii) All documents for Strojnik v. Mehta, No. 1:20-cv-01325-SCY-LF shall be filed only in this case: Strojnik v. Albuquerque Boca Hotel, LP, No. 1:20-cv-00843-WJGBW. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-01325-WJ-GBW Document 3 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2 ________________________________________ WILLIAM P. JOHNSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.