Strojnik v. Albuquerque Boca Hotel, LP, No. 1:2020cv00843 - Document 42 (D.N.M. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson denying Motion to Remand Doc. 13 in 20-cv-00940- WJ-GBW (meq)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Strojnik v. Albuquerque Boca Hotel, LP Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PETER STROJNIK, Plaintiff, v. ALBUQUERQUE BOCA HOTEL, LP D/B/A CROWNE PLAZA ALBUQUERQUE, No. 1:20-cv-00843-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00875- WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00938- WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00940- WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-00998- WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-01003-WJ-GBW No. 1:20-cv-01034-WJ-GBW Consolidated Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand the Brand Deceit Claim in Count 2 to the 1st Judicial District Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(c), Doc. 13, filed October 13, 2020 (“Motion to Remand”), in Strojnik v. Ashford Posada, L.P., No. 1:20-cv-00940WJ-GBW. Plaintiff filed his Motion to Remand in Strojnik v. Ashford Posada, L.P., No. 1:20-cv00940- WJ-GBW, after the Court consolidated Strojnik v. Ashford Posada, L.P. with this lead case and ordered that all documents be filed only in this lead case. See Doc. 30, filed October 1, 2020. Plaintiff did not file his Motion to Remand in this lead case. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand for failure to comply with the Court’s Order that all documents be filed only in this lead case (1:20 -cv-00843-WJ-GBW). IT IS ORDERED that: (i) Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand the Brand Deceit Claim in Count 2 to the 1st Judicial District Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(c), Doc. 13, filed October 13, 2020, in Strojnik v. Ashford Posada, L.P., No. 1:20-cv-00940- WJ-GBW, is DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com (ii) The Clerk shall also file this Order in Strojnik v. Ashford Posada, L.P., No. 1:20cv-00940- WJ-GBW, and terminate Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. ________________________________________ WILLIAM P. JOHNSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
