Palacios-Sifuentes v. USA, No. 1:2019cv01088 - Document 11 (D.N.M. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Adrian Palacios; and DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE 1 Motion to Vacate/Set As ide/Correct Sentence (2255). Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 10 ) are ADOPTED. Petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (doc. 1 ) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (gr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Palacios-Sifuentes v. USA Doc. 11 Case 1:19-cv-01088-MV-GBW Document 11 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ADRIAN PALACIOS, Petitioner, vs. No. CIV 19-1088-MV-GBW No. CR 18-3898-MV-GBW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (“PFRD”) (doc. 10), recommending that the Court deny Petitioner’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (doc. 1) and dismiss all claims with prejudice. This case was referred to the Magistrate Judge to conduct hearings and perform legal analysis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3) and Va. Beach Fed. Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990). See doc. 8. The Magistrate Judge filed his PFRD recommending dismissal on June 26, 2020. Doc. 10. Neither Petitioner nor Respondent filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s PFRD within the allotted time. Appellate review of these issues is therefore waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059– 60 (10th Cir. 1996). Failure to object to the PFRD also waives the right to de novo review by the district court. See id. at 1060; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–150 (1985). Nevertheless, the Court elected Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-01088-MV-GBW Document 11 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 2 to conduct a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings in this case. See One Parcel, 73 F.3d at 1061. The Court hereby concurs with all of the factual and legal conclusions recited therein. Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 10) are ADOPTED. Petitioner’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (doc. 1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. MARTHA VÁZQUEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
