Sanchez v. San Juan County Adult Detention Facility et al, No. 1:2019cv00425 - Document 14 (D.N.M. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge David H. Urias. IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights Doc. 1 filed by Plaintiff Louie Salom Sanchez Jr. is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order, failure to comply with the local rules, and failure to prosecute. (arp)

Download PDF
Sanchez v. San Juan County Adult Detention Facility et al Doc. 14 Case 1:19-cv-00425-DHU-KBM Document 14 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LOUIE SALOMÉ SANCHEZ JR., Plaintiff, vs. No. CV 19-00425 DHU/KBM SAN JUAN COUNTY ADULT DETENTION FACILITY, WARDEN HAVEL, SAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, NURSE KAMMY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) on the Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Doc. 1) filed by Plaintiff Louie Salomé Sanchez Jr. The Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order, failure to comply with local rules, and failure to prosecute. On April 18, 2022, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the Complaint and granting Plaintiff Salazar leave to file an amended § 1983 complaint within 30 days. (Doc. 13). The Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order stated that, if an amended complaint was not filed within 30 days, the Court could dismiss the case without further notice. (Doc. 13 at 12-13). More than 30 days has elapsed since entry of the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Plaintiff Salazar has not filed an amended complaint, has not responded to the Memorandum Opinion and Order, and has not communicated with the Court. Pro se litigants are required to follow the federal rules of procedure and simple, nonburdensome local rules. See Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir. 1980). The 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00425-DHU-KBM Document 14 Filed 06/02/22 Page 2 of 2 local rules require litigants, including prisoners, to keep the Court apprised of their proper mailing address and to maintain contact with the Court. D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6. Plaintiff Salazar has failed to comply with D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6, and with the Court’s April 18, 2022 Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 13). Plaintiff Salazar has failed to comply with the Court’s order and failed to prosecute this action. The Court may dismiss an action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute, to comply with the rules, or to comply with court orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204, n. 3 (10th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court will dismiss this civil proceeding pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court’s April 18, 2022 Memorandum Opinion and Order, failure to comply with D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6, and failure to prosecute this proceeding. IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Doc. 1) filed by Plaintiff Louie Salomé Sanchez Jr. is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, failure to comply with the local rules, and failure to prosecute. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.