JACKSON- JIMINEZ v. GREEN, No. 2:2017cv00293 - Document 5 (D.N.J. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 3/29/2017. (ld, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
JACKSON- JIMINEZ v. GREEN Doc. 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ : KENDALL JACKSON JIMINEZ, : Civil Action No. 17-293 (JMV) : Petitioner, : : v. : OPINION : CHARLES L. GREEN, : : Respondent. : ____________________________________: APPEARANCES: MIKHAIL USHER Usher Law Group, PC 2711 Harway Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11214 On behalf of Petitioner MARK CHRISTOPHER ORLOWSKI Office of the U.S. Attorney District of New Jersey 970 Broad Street, Suite 700 Newark, NJ 01701 On behalf of Respondent. VAZQUEZ, United States District Judge Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on January 16, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) He alleges a violation of his right to due process based on prolonged pre-final removal order detention in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (“ICE”). (Id.) Petitioner is confined in Essex County Correctional Facility, and he has been in custody since May 19, 2016. (Id., ¶10.) Respondent submitted a letter response to the petition on March 27, 2017. (ECF No. 4.) Dockets.Justia.com Respondent does not object to a remand ordering an Immigration Judge to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing, in accordance with 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(c). The Court will, therefore, grant the habeas petition and order Respondent to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing. See ChavezAlvarez v. Warden York County Prison, 783 F.3d 469, 478 (3d Cir. 2015) (due process requires that detention without bail pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) be limited to a reasonable period of time to further the goals of the detention statute.) An appropriate Order follows. Date: March 29, 2017 At Newark, New Jersey s/ John Michael Vazquez JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
