WITHERSPOON v. WITHERSPOON, No. 2:2014cv06314 - Document 2 (D.N.J. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION re 1 Complaint Received. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 10/20/14. (dr, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WITHERSPOON v. WITHERSPOON Doc. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : Plaintiff, : v. : : : DESMOND M. WITHERSPOON, : Defendant. : : : DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Civil Action No. 14-6314 (SRC) OPINION CHESLER, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff s claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, without providing any information, Plaintiff claims he is entitled to un-paid wages from Desmond M. Witherspoon. Plaintiff submitted the same claim against the same Defendant in Civil Action Nos. 14-5642 and 14-6296. The Court dismissed those claims for failing to state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and for failing to state a facially plausible claim for relief. This Complaint suffers from the same deficiency, and it is duplicative. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed. s/Stanley R. Chesler STANLEY R. CHESLER United States District Judge Dated: October 20, 2014 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
