ADU et al v. A.T.I. U.S.A., INC. et al, No. 2:2013cv03835 - Document 13 (D.N.J. 2013)
Court Description: Opinion and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 11/4/13. (jd, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ADU et al v. A.T.I. U.S.A., INC. et al Doc. 13 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARGARET ADU, et a!., Civil Action No. 13-3835 (JLL) Plaintiff, v. OPINION A.T.I. U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants. LINARES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants A.T.I. U.S.A. and CMA CGM’s requests for entry of dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint with prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline specified by the Court in its August 23, 2013 and August 28, 2013 Orders. {CM/ECF Nos. 6, 8.) Although Plaintiffs attorney no longer represents Plaintiff as of October 28, 2013, [CM/ECF No. 121, since she represented Plaintiff as of the dates of the Court’s previous Orders, the Court assumes that Plaintiffs attorney informed Plaintiff of the deadlines to amend when those Orders were issued. Therefore, because Plaintiff failed to file a Complaint within the thirty-day time period specified by this Court in its aforementioned Orders, IT IS on this day of November, 2013, ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
