BAKER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al, No. 1:2022cv02423 - Document 20 (D.N.J. 2024)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint under Local Civil Rule 10.1; Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current address; the Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of Plaintiff's updated address. Signed by Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/29/2024. (mag, N.M.)

Download PDF
BAKER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COREY BAKER, Case No. 22–cv–02423–ESK–AMD Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Corey Baker submitted a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 27, 2022 (Complaint). (ECF No. 1.) On August 28, 2024, mail sent to plaintiff at his address of record was returned to the Clerk’s Office as undeliverable. (ECF No. 19.) The return sticker stated “Return to Sender. Refused. Unable to Forward.” (Id.) Pro se plaintiffs have an obligation to keep the Clerk’s Office informed as to their current addresses. L.Civ.R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their … address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk.”). Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding a change of address. “Failure to file a notice of address change may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.” L.Civ.R. 10.1(a). IT IS on this 29th day of August 2024 ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint under Local Civil Rule 10.1. 2. Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current address. The Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of plaintiff’s updated address. Dockets.Justia.com 3. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Opinion and Order to plaintiff by regular mail at his last known address. /s/ Edward S. Kiel EDWARD S. KIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.