HOLLAND v. N'DIAYE, No. 1:2021cv14155 - Document 7 (D.N.J. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/29/2022. (dmr)(n.m.)

Download PDF
HOLLAND v. N'DIAYE Doc. 7 Case 1:21-cv-14155-RMB Document 7 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 53 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE ________________________ KEVIN HOLLAND, Petitioner v. LAMINE N’DIAYE, Respondent ________________________ : : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 21-14155 (RMB) OPINION BUMB, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner Kevin Holland’s (“Petitioner”) motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 6) of this Court’s Opinion and Order dated November 17, 2021, sua sponte dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction. On October 4, 2021, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated and remanded United States v. Nasir to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Greer v. United States, 593 U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 2090, 210 L.Ed.2d 121 (2021). 1 United States v. Nasir, 142 S. Ct. 56 (Oct. 4, 2021). Greer did not address the issue of whether inchoate crimes are included in the definition of controlled substance offenses in U.S.S.G. § 1 The Supreme Court also denied a petition for certiorari in United States v. Nasir. See Nasir v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 275 (Oct. 4, 2021) (cert. denied). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-14155-RMB Document 7 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 54 4B1.2(b). Therefore, it is not clear whether Petitioner has a claim under Nasir, and if so, how and when the claim may be presented. Therefore, this Court will grant Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and direct Respondent to file an answer that addresses jurisdiction and the merits of the petition. An appropriate Order follows. Dated: June 29, 2022 s/Renée Marie Bumb RENÉE MARIE BUMB United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.