BEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al, No. 1:2020cv15702 - Document 9 (D.N.J. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Denying 8 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed IFP and directing the Clerk to mark this case as CLOSED etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 12/4/2020. (cry, n.m.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al Doc. 9 Case 1:20-cv-15702-NLH-AMD Document 9 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JAMIL AMIN BEY 1:20-cv-15702-NLH-AMD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and HON. YOLANDA C. RODRIGUEZ Defendants. WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jamil Amin Bey, appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights, among other claims, without submitting the required filing fee or filing applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 54.3, the Clerk shall not be required to enter any suit, file any paper, issue any process, or render any other service for which a fee is prescribed, unless the fee is paid in advance; and WHEREAS, under Title 28, section 1915 of the United States Code, however, a court may allow a litigant to proceed without prepayment of fees if he submits a proper IFP application, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); and WHEREAS, because Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application, this Court ordered the Clerk of the Court to administratively terminate this action, without Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-15702-NLH-AMD Document 9 Filed 12/04/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 49 filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee, on November 10, 2020 (ECF No. 4); and WHEREAS, Plaintiff was granted leave to apply to re-open within forty-five (45) days by either paying the filing fee or submitting the proper IFP application; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, Plaintiff submitted an IFP application on the correct form (ECF No. 5); and WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s submitted IFP application nonetheless remained deficient, having responded “$0.00” to every question on the form regarding his income, assets, and monthly expenses and having attached a boilerplate form stating that Plaintiff “does not have, or possess, any gold or silver coins” and then claimed that “Your demand for a ‘Financial Statements’ is used as an instrument to deny me due process of law and right to free access to the courts;” and WHEREAS, the Court found that without further explanation as to Plaintiff’s assets and monthly expenses, it did not have sufficient information to properly assess Plaintiff’s ability to pay the costs associated with this proceeding (ECF 6); and WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s IFP application was therefore denied, and Plaintiff was granted leave to file another, proper and complete IFP application within twenty (20) days (ECF 7); and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed another IFP application (ECF 8); and 2 Case 1:20-cv-15702-NLH-AMD Document 9 Filed 12/04/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 50 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s new IFP application adds only the statement that “I am unable to pay any fee in lawful money. United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 ‘All are equal before the Law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the Law. Per 12 USC Section 411 states The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and can not be pain USD. This issue must proceed PRO BONO pursuant to Article 1 Section 8 and 10 of the United States Constitution;” and WHEREAS, the Court finds that this application is again deficient, providing no further information that would allow the Court to determine Plaintiff’s ability to pay the costs associated with this proceeding; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff has now been afforded three separate opportunities to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and the Local Rules of this Court, and has failed to do so despite direct instructions from this Court; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY on this 4th day of December , 2020 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall mark this case as CLOSED; and it is further 3 Case 1:20-cv-15702-NLH-AMD Document 9 Filed 12/04/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 51 ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff by regular mail. /s Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
